From a static benefit page to a personalized, guided benefit
Fidelity’s Student Debt Retirement dashboard had barely changed since the benefit launched in 2019. Participants enrolled, then couldn’t tell what the benefit was worth or what to do next. I led the redesign that turns it into a guide, going live January 2027.
task success in usability testing, across 15 sessions and 5 tasks
3×
more participants could explain how the match works
Before · 2019After · 2027
Sweeps slowly on its own. Drag, or use the arrow keys, to take over.
TL;DR
THE PROBLEM
The dashboard was a static page: a balance, a loan list and generic alerts. Participants enrolled, then stopped engaging, and many missed their full employer match.
WHAT I DID
I reframed the page around the questions participants kept asking, tested it across three research studies, and rebuilt it on Fidelity’s design system.
WHAT’S LAUNCHING
Level 1 goes live January 2027 with personalized guidance and loan self-service. The benefit timeline and match simulator follow in mid to late 2027.
01 · CONTEXT
A benefit page that stood still
1234
Where it started
Student Debt Retirement lets participants count student loan payments toward their employer’s retirement match. Since 2019 the dashboard had barely changed: a balance, a list of loans, and alerts pointing to secure messages.
Participants couldn’t remove or update a loan, couldn’t see their match, and didn’t know when to act. The result was calls to Participant Services, missed matches, and a benefit people enrolled in but didn’t understand.
1No benefit name. The page says “Learn more about this benefit” and nothing else.
2The employer contribution card has no amount, no dates and nothing to act on.
3Every loan says “View/add payments”, so nothing signals which loan needs attention.
4“Pending verification” and “Ineligible loan” come with no explanation or next step.
02 · HOW I FRAMED IT
From static page to guided benefit
The static page answered one question: what’s on file. Participants were asking different ones. Which benefit is this? What do I do next? Is it worth it for me?
Leadership pushed us to get visionary first, then step back to what could ship. So I designed the full guided experience, then split it into levels: guidance and loan self-service first, the timeline and match simulator next.
STATIC PAGE
·Balance
·Loan list
·Generic alerts
Answers: what’s on file?
→
GUIDED BENEFIT
1Which benefit is this?
2What do I do next?
3Is it worth it for me?
Answers the questions participants actually ask
Design systems: the 2019 launch system, then 2024 Secure 2.0, then the Fidelity Design System.
Research: a 2023 benchmark (7 participants), 2024 usability (15 sessions, 5 tasks), 2025 interviews on the redesigned summary, and 2026 research on the match simulator and 401k product integration, which is ongoing.
Dropped: linked versus manual loan labels, and the timeline for Level 1.
Carried forward: snapshot cards based on engagement, including the seasonal top cards, became the three-card row on today’s dashboard, with a next best action added. The payment track card went into the final.
Reshaped: match percentage, carried forward as the benefit insight card.
Level 1 goes live January 2027; key dates, the match simulator and benefit impact follow in mid to late 2027.
HOW RESEARCH SHAPED IT
2023 · BENCHMARK
7 participants on the current dashboard. Every core task scored severe or moderate.
2024 · USABILITY
15 moderated sessions across five tasks: add a payment, add a loan, remove a loan, unenroll, re-enroll.
2025 · INTERVIEWS
With the redesigned summary, participants could judge whether the benefit fit their situation.
03 · KEY SOLUTIONS
What we tried, and what won
Frames from the iterations behind the dashboard. Scroll, and it narrows to what’s launching. Pick a theme to see how it ended.
THE TOP OF THE PAGE
The most impactful design elements
Based on research, these design elements contributed most to user engagement and benefit comprehension.
1 · Notifications
One place for what needs you
Came from generic alerts. The audit showed alerts already overwhelmed people.
Why it won The most time-sensitive item leads and says Take action. An account problem sits right under it. Each is one sentence with one arrow, so nothing needs a second alert.
2 · Student loan payments
Your payments, and one thing to do
Came from the 2023 snapshot card that tracked payments.
Why it won The year’s total stays big and plain. Pending payments and the last payment date sit beneath it, and Add a payment is the single action, so it’s clear what counts and how to add more.
3 · Dynamic message card
Tells you what to do now
Came from the snapshot cards, with a next best action added in the context of the snapshot data.
Why it won It changes with where you are in the period. During annual review it asks you to review and add last year’s payments, with one button. A hierarchy model decides which action leads.
What went wrong, and what I traded
The design system changed twice, so concepts were rebuilt.
Seasonal cards were tested and folded into the snapshot cards.
The full vision was bigger than what could ship first.
Vision first, then cut: kept the story, but showed more than Level 1 delivers.
Ship early, fold in later: value sooner, but each feature works in two shells.
04 · WHAT’S LAUNCHING
One vision, launching in phases
Designing the whole experience first made it easier to cut scope without losing the story. Each phase stands on its own, and the early ones fold into the new dashboard.
AUG 2026
Features that ship early
New experiences, like adding a loan, ship on the current dashboard first, then fold into the new one.
JAN 2027
Level 1 goes live
The new dashboard: benefit name, next best action, and loan self-service.
MID TO LATE 2027
Personalization cards
Benefit timeline, impact insights and the match simulator, layered on top of Level 1.
Results will be added after Level 1 launches.
05 · KEY LEARNINGS
Three things I’d take into every project from here.
01
Comprehension Must Be Designed
Clear content and visual scaffolding aren’t polish — they’re the core of the product. Without comprehension, engagement is impossible regardless of how well the feature works.
02
Personalization Transforms Perception
Integrating real contribution data and showing benefit fit in context of each participant’s situation turned an abstract benefit into something that felt relevant and worth acting on.
03
Design the Vision, Ship in Levels
Designing the full guided experience first made it easier to cut scope without losing the story. Each level stands on its own and sets up the next.